"I've finally read the transcript of the FWG meeting. I actually didn't think it was so terrible.
"Yes, there were 'full,fair,frank exchanges of views' as the diplomats would say, but I thought the meeting got to what is a fundamental split on the question of how to award facilities grants-- or indeed if any should be awarded.
"I think all too often the academics and research institution representatives on the ICOC have exhibited almost a sense of entitlement to CIRM money.
"I am delighted to see members of the Facilities Working Group voicing their sense of responsibility to California taxpayers to be good stewards of CIRM funds. They are taking their responsibility seriously and should be commended for that.
"I'd also add that on the issue of making facilities grants, the academics are clearly conflicted.
"Deliberate speed is appropriate, but the emphasis must be on deliberate – not on speed for speed's sake."
With more than 3.0 million page views and more than 5,000 items, this blog provides news and commentary on public policy, business and economic issues related to the $3 billion California stem cell agency. David Jensen, a retired California newsman, has published this blog since January 2005. His email address is djensen@californiastemcellreport.com.
Sunday, April 22, 2007
CIRM's Facilities Meeting: 'Not So Terrible'
The contentious Friday the 13th session of the Facilities Working Group of the California stem cell agency triggers different reactions from different folks. We queried John M. Simpson, stem cell project director of the California Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumers Rights, about his impressions. Here is his reply.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment