data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73162/7316294470ff7a1e499085c9b23cf921605745af" alt=""
A document from Mays that CIRM released
said reviewers' objections could be addressed by “information that may
not have been adequately conveyed at the time or with new information
that has since become available.” The document laid out several
“recent” studies that it said supported its pitch for funding in
a phase two clinical trial.
CIRM's review summary also raised the
question of how much of the work would be done in California. The
stem cell agency is limited to funding research in California.
May's appeal said,
“We are conducting the phase 2 clinical study at many high volume clinical sites across the U.S., including in California. With respect to the process development work intended to support scaled-up / optimized manufacturing for subsequent phase 3 studies and commercialization, we plan to complete key elements of this work in California, with collaborators such as UC-Davis. We are in the process of building up our California beachhead, and plan that several California-based employees will manage the clinical study, as well as the process development work. Ultimately, success in the phase 2 clinical study and in the process development work would lead to the establishment of a manufacturing plant in California to support later stage development and commercialization in the western half of the U.S. and Asia.”
The Athersys application came in CIRM's
first strategic partnership round. Two out of six applications were
approved by reviewers. The winners, whose identities are being
withheld until tomorrow by the stem cell agency, received scores of
88 and 73. The scores of the other applicants and their identities
were also withheld by the agency.
The Athersys appeal will come before
the CIRM governing board at its meeting tomorrow in Burlingame, Ca.
No comments:
Post a Comment