A Canadian scientist this week took issue with treatment
on this Web site of stem cell diabetes research as a Massachusetts-California duel.
James Johnson, a primary member of the Diabetes Research
Group at the University of British Columbia, referred to an item yesterday on the California Stem Cell Report.
James Johnson, UBC photo |
In an exchange of emails this week with this writer, Johnson
said “there are at least 25 large groups working in this sphere, not two.”
One of those groups is the Diabetes Research Group in
British Columbia, whose research is backed by a subsidiary of Johnson &
Johnson.
In a follow-up email, Johnson said,
“My point was that I think portraying it as a race between 2-3 groups misrepresents what is a global effort.”
He added,
“Personally I doubt Harvard or ViaCyte (a San Diego firm) will be the first to market such a therapy.”
Johnson makes a good point concerning the worldwide effort
on diabetes. The search for a stem cell cure or therapy for diabetes goes well beyond
California and Massachusetts.
A “duel” existed, nonetheless, between them as the result of
an article in the MIT Technology Review and an item on the blog of UC Davis
stem cell researcher Paul Knoepfler. In the
MIT piece, Harvard researcher Doug Melton commented critically on the ViaCyte
effort. Paul Laikind, CEO of the San Diego firm, defended his project on the
Knoepfler blog.
The California Stem Cell Report, which focuses almost
entirely on California stem cell matters and the $3 billion state stem cell
agency, was particularly interested in all this because the agency has pumped
$55 million into ViaCyte. It is the largest amount that the state has invested
in a single company.
Additionally, ViaCyte’s clinical trial is also the only
diabetes clinical trial in the United States based on human embryonic stem
cells, which, of course, generate far more controversy than adult stem cells.
As for the worldwide state of diabetes stem
cell research, perhaps it could be described as a global scrum, the grunting and heaving moment in rugby when multiple players tussle to control the ball.
No comments:
Post a Comment