The directors of the California stem cell agency are preparing to jump into a brutal political fray in the hallowed halls of Congress that pits, in the views of some, a "global corporatist elite" against American entrepreneurs and inventors.
It is all about patent law and so-called reform. More than 100 lobbying firms representing at least 267 organizations have already joined the battle. Millions of dollars are being spent to influence the outcome.
Patent law is one of the more arcane subjects in the public policy arena. The CIRM directors Legislative Subcommittee is being asked to make a considered judgment on the controversial emotional and technical issues during a brief, 90-minute meeting on Monday that includes other significant matters.
And with only three business days before the meeting, CIRM has not publicly presented a summary of the legislation and issues. No analysis, no pros and cons and no rationale for why the state agency should be involved are available. The meeting agenda does not even state that patent reform is the matter to be discussed.
It is exceedingly unlikely, to put it mildly, that CIRM's position for or against the legislation will make a dime's worth of difference, given the vast number of players and their global importance. Directors should step back and rethink their policy on lobbying legislation either at the national or state level. CIRM has more than enough to do running a research program that will cost California taxpayers $6 billion, including interest.
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Litvack Picks Up Public Support for Bid to Become Chair of Stem Cell Agency
The Consumer Watchdog organization today endorsed a Los Angeles cardiologist as the new chairman of the $3 billion California stem cell agency, declaring that it is time to "correct the agency's dysfunctional management structure."
Writing in an op-ed piece in this morning's Sacramento Bee, John M. Simpson, stem cell project director of the Santa Monica organization, called for the election of Frank Litvack over bond financier Jonathan Thomas, chairman of Saybrook Capital, also of Santa Monica.
Simpson noted that the agency has been much criticized for its dual executive structure, which has led to public conflict and issues involving the outgoing chairman, Robert Klein, and president. Simpson said Litvack believes that the chairman should not be involved in day-to-day management at CIRM. Thomas is believed to envision a more hands-on role for the chairman.
Simpson wrote,
Writing in an op-ed piece in this morning's Sacramento Bee, John M. Simpson, stem cell project director of the Santa Monica organization, called for the election of Frank Litvack over bond financier Jonathan Thomas, chairman of Saybrook Capital, also of Santa Monica.
Simpson noted that the agency has been much criticized for its dual executive structure, which has led to public conflict and issues involving the outgoing chairman, Robert Klein, and president. Simpson said Litvack believes that the chairman should not be involved in day-to-day management at CIRM. Thomas is believed to envision a more hands-on role for the chairman.
Simpson wrote,
"As CIRM was in startup mode, Klein was very much a hands-on chairman, intimately involved in the agency's day-to-day management. The problem is that CIRM's president is supposed to be the chief executive.Simpson said,
"Klein's propensity to micromanage was understandable – perhaps even helpful – as CIRM got off the ground. But it continued during Klein's six-year tenure."
"CIRM already has a world-renowned $500,000-a-year stem cell scientist – its President Alan Trounson. There's no need to spend another half-million on an investment banker so two executives can trip over each other at taxpayer expense.Simpson's piece also contains a concise summary of the all the hooha since last fall surrounding selection of Klein's successor.
"Litvack understands what the chairman's role should be and has realistic expectations about a salary. He should be elected so the agency can move successfully beyond the Klein era and perhaps to a time when it becomes simpler to get things done at CIRM."
Email to the California Stem Cell Report
My email provider seems to be having difficulties and is bouncing back messages to senders. For readers who may be trying to email me, please use this alternate email address: svhopalong(at)gmail.com.
Researcher Alert: Fresh Opportunities Looming for CIRM Cash
Drawing nearly all the attention nowadays at the California stem cell agency is selection of a new chairman, but real work is also going on.
That is not to underestimate the importance of the decision, but the trains still have to keep running at CIRM headquarters in San Francisco.
Next Monday, for example, the directors' Science Subcommittee will meet to consider matters that all potential grant applicants should be watching.
One involves a possible mechanism that could be used by some applicants to advance their cause with information not in the grant application. Its main purpose seems, however, to give reviewers a chance to dig deeper into a grant proposal. Another proposal before the committee would extend the more than $90 million "new faculty" grant program into another round. A third would create an "opportunity" fund controlled by the CIRM president. A blue-ribbon panel last fall recommended the idea.
No details were available on any of this on the CIRM web site as of Monday night, only four business days before the subcommittee meeting.
The agenda item on the grant application information was the most fulsome, but only said,
That is not to underestimate the importance of the decision, but the trains still have to keep running at CIRM headquarters in San Francisco.
Next Monday, for example, the directors' Science Subcommittee will meet to consider matters that all potential grant applicants should be watching.
One involves a possible mechanism that could be used by some applicants to advance their cause with information not in the grant application. Its main purpose seems, however, to give reviewers a chance to dig deeper into a grant proposal. Another proposal before the committee would extend the more than $90 million "new faculty" grant program into another round. A third would create an "opportunity" fund controlled by the CIRM president. A blue-ribbon panel last fall recommended the idea.
No details were available on any of this on the CIRM web site as of Monday night, only four business days before the subcommittee meeting.
The agenda item on the grant application information was the most fulsome, but only said,
"Discussion of process for obtaining supplemental information from applicants for Clinical Trial and Disease Team grant rounds, including an opportunity to obtain information during Peer Review, subject to later staff confirmation, of additional information not presented in the application."Even less information was offered up concerning the faculty program and the opportunity fund. However, in March , CIRM President Alan Trounson told CIRM directors,
"The Governing Board could create an 'Opportunity Fund' to be used by the President to rapidly provide continuation funds for projects identified by VP, R & D and members of the Clinical Advisory Panel as having been highly successful and their plan to move forward is compelling and competitive as assessed against defined criteria. This process would accelerate existing promising and competitive CIRM projects and reduce the amount of time spent writing proposals and in review. CIRM already has mechanisms to discontinue or cut back projects that are not making progress. This additional tool would allow CIRM to accelerate projects that are beating expectations."Interested parties can participate in the discussion at telephonic locations in San Francisco, Irvine(2), La Jolla, Healdsburg and Stanford. Specific addresses can be found on the agenda.
Monday, May 30, 2011
Opportunities for Public Comment on Nominees for CIRM Chair
Directors of the California stem cell agency are planning at least three public meetings prior to making their decision on cardiologist Frank Litvack or bond financier Jonathan Thomas to replace outgoing chairman Robert Klein at the end of June.
The public will have a chance to weigh in with comments at all of the meetings. Two sessions have telephonic locations throughout the state, including San Francisco, Los Angeles(2), Coronado, La Jolla, Irvine (2), West Hollywood, South San Francisco and Berkeley.
Here is the schedule, according to the board's outside counsel, James Harrison.
June 3 (next Friday) – CIRM directors' Evaluation Subcommittee telephonic meeting to which all 29 members of the CIRM governing board have been invited. The session will begin with a brief public presentation by the candidates. Then they will be questioned separately behind closed doors. By law, the public can participate during the public portion from the telephonic locations. You can find the addresses of the locations on the agenda. Some are vague and will require contacting CIRM in advance for more specifics. The locations could change, be dropped or more added.
June 6 – Evaluation Subcommittee meeting possibly involving all board members. Again, public participation is possible with the caveats noted above. No action is expected to be taken at either the June 3 or June 6 meetings, Harrison told the California Stem Cell Report.
June 22-23 – Full CIRM board meeting in San Diego with the candidates making a public presentation. A closed session is expected prior to a public vote, which could well be publicly unanimous by that point. Again, the public will have a chance to comment. The specific address for the meeting is yet to be announced.
The public or other interested parties can also comment by emailing information to the CIRM board and asking that it be distributed to all members. That should be done earlier rather than later in order to have any impact.
The schedule of meetings could change depending on the druthers of the CIRM board.
The public will have a chance to weigh in with comments at all of the meetings. Two sessions have telephonic locations throughout the state, including San Francisco, Los Angeles(2), Coronado, La Jolla, Irvine (2), West Hollywood, South San Francisco and Berkeley.
Here is the schedule, according to the board's outside counsel, James Harrison.
June 3 (next Friday) – CIRM directors' Evaluation Subcommittee telephonic meeting to which all 29 members of the CIRM governing board have been invited. The session will begin with a brief public presentation by the candidates. Then they will be questioned separately behind closed doors. By law, the public can participate during the public portion from the telephonic locations. You can find the addresses of the locations on the agenda. Some are vague and will require contacting CIRM in advance for more specifics. The locations could change, be dropped or more added.
June 6 – Evaluation Subcommittee meeting possibly involving all board members. Again, public participation is possible with the caveats noted above. No action is expected to be taken at either the June 3 or June 6 meetings, Harrison told the California Stem Cell Report.
June 22-23 – Full CIRM board meeting in San Diego with the candidates making a public presentation. A closed session is expected prior to a public vote, which could well be publicly unanimous by that point. Again, the public will have a chance to comment. The specific address for the meeting is yet to be announced.
The public or other interested parties can also comment by emailing information to the CIRM board and asking that it be distributed to all members. That should be done earlier rather than later in order to have any impact.
The schedule of meetings could change depending on the druthers of the CIRM board.
Good News for CIRM and Not-So-Good News
The $3 billion California stem cell agency made the papers this weekend in Los Angeles and San Francisco.
One story dealt with research funded by CIRM, the other with selection of its next chairman.
The story by freelance writer Amber Dance in the Los Angeles Times was the sort of coverage that CIRM needs more of if it is to win approval of the possible, new $5 billion bond measure touted by Chairman Robert Klein.
The article had an optimistic lead on a promising ViaCyte Inc. therapy for diabetes. It cited in the second paragraph CIRM's $26 million in funding to the San Diego firm. CIRM President Alan Trounson was quoted. All that in a newspaper that has the largest circulation in California and that has largely ignored CIRM.
The other piece appeared in the San Francisco Examiner. Authored by Katie Worth, the headline read,
The puzzle for CIRM is how to generate enough positive pieces.
One story dealt with research funded by CIRM, the other with selection of its next chairman.
The story by freelance writer Amber Dance in the Los Angeles Times was the sort of coverage that CIRM needs more of if it is to win approval of the possible, new $5 billion bond measure touted by Chairman Robert Klein.
The article had an optimistic lead on a promising ViaCyte Inc. therapy for diabetes. It cited in the second paragraph CIRM's $26 million in funding to the San Diego firm. CIRM President Alan Trounson was quoted. All that in a newspaper that has the largest circulation in California and that has largely ignored CIRM.
The other piece appeared in the San Francisco Examiner. Authored by Katie Worth, the headline read,
"California stem cell czar offered top pay, asked to name job description."It began by saying that the new CIRM chairman could have a salary of more than $500,000. The story mirrored the lack of clarity on the part of the CIRM board concerning exactly what the chairman should do. Worth quoted from the Little Hoover Commission report on CIRM. She wrote,
"In 2009, California’s Little Hoover Commission criticized CIRM’s governance structure, noting that Klein’s 'actions and personal style' and the fact that he essentially wrote his own résumé into the requirements for chairman, create a situation that 'distorts accountability and succession planning and could, in the event of an abrupt departure of the individual, leave the agency leaderless for an extended period.'"In the world of marketing, PR and election campaigns, it takes a lot of positive stories to counter the ones that reflect poorly on an enterprise, such as Worth's.
The puzzle for CIRM is how to generate enough positive pieces.
CIRM's Klein Honored by Scientists
The International Society for Stem Cell Research announced last week that it is making its first ever public service award to Robert Klein, the outgoing chairman of the $3 billion California stem cell agency.
In a news release, the scientific group cited Klein "for his outstanding contribution of public service to the field of stem cell research and regenerative medicine."
The ISSCR said,
In a news release, the scientific group cited Klein "for his outstanding contribution of public service to the field of stem cell research and regenerative medicine."
The ISSCR said,
"Through his vision as author and champion of the California Stem Cell Research and Cures Initiative (Proposition 71), Klein secured long-term financial support for stem cell research in California. Through his leadership at CIRM, Klein developed a framework that fosters new and established talent, innovative science and clinical application. His advocacy for stable financial support for stem cell research on the international stage has been unprecedented."
IOM Study of CIRM: Panel to be Appointed in Fall
The Institute of Medicine study of the $3 billion California stem cell agency begins in July but the full IOM committee is not expected to be appointed until next fall.
Responding to an inquiry from the California Stem Cell Report, Adrienne Stith Butler, study director for the $700,000 CIRM-financed project, said that the IOM will make information about the process available on the Internet in July. She said,
Previously, Stith Butler served as study director for the IOM report, "Preparing for the Psychological Consequences of Terrorism: A Public Health Strategy." She served as a staff officer for the IOM reports, 'In the Nation’s Compelling Interest: Ensuring Diversity in the Health-Care Workforce" and "Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care." She also participated in The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.
Responding to an inquiry from the California Stem Cell Report, Adrienne Stith Butler, study director for the $700,000 CIRM-financed project, said that the IOM will make information about the process available on the Internet in July. She said,
"There will be two sources of information about the project - the IOM website and the National Academies website. Once the committee is appointed and the study begins we will distribute information about the meetings through a list serve (sign up will be on the study's IOM page, which will be posted once the study begins). In addition, information about meetings and opportunities for public comments will be available through the National Academies Current Projects System (this is a separate system from the IOM page).Stith Butler replaces Cathy Liverman as the study director on the project. Liverman was involved in the preparation of the original proposal to CIRM.
"Once we begin in July, you can find information on the IOM site at www.iom.edu. The Current Projects System posts the study once the committee is appointed (which will probably be early fall). That system can be accessed at www.nationalacademies.org."
Previously, Stith Butler served as study director for the IOM report, "Preparing for the Psychological Consequences of Terrorism: A Public Health Strategy." She served as a staff officer for the IOM reports, 'In the Nation’s Compelling Interest: Ensuring Diversity in the Health-Care Workforce" and "Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care." She also participated in The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.
Friday, May 27, 2011
CIRM Makes Formal Announcement of Thomas-Litvack Nominations
The California stem cell agency has posted its own version of the nomination of two Los Angeles men to become the new chairman of the $3 billion research enterprise.
The announcement came yesterday. The nominations were made last Friday and Monday and were covered at the time by a handful of news outlets.
The CIRM notice was a straight-forward, five-paragraph item and contained links on the CIRM web site to nominating letters and statements of interest from both Jonathan Thomas, bond financier, and Frank Litvack, a cardiologist. Also linked to was a bio on Litvack.
The announcement came yesterday. The nominations were made last Friday and Monday and were covered at the time by a handful of news outlets.
The CIRM notice was a straight-forward, five-paragraph item and contained links on the CIRM web site to nominating letters and statements of interest from both Jonathan Thomas, bond financier, and Frank Litvack, a cardiologist. Also linked to was a bio on Litvack.
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Read All About It!
For you curious souls out there, I have freshened up information on this web site about the California Stem Cell Report and its background. If you are interested, here is a link.
If you have questions – embarrassing or otherwise – please feel free to send them along to me at djensen@californiastemcellreport.com. Depending on your druthers, I will answer them in a private email or online here. If you prefer, you can post them anonymously by clicking on the word "comment" at the end of this item. I strongly believe that people who write on public walls – that includes all government agencies and CIRM as well as the media – should be prepared to be fully and publicly examined, even if it is uncomfortable or worse.
If you have suggestions or comment on the content, direction or tone of what appears on the California Stem Cell Report, please use the same methods of communication. I am looking forward to hearing from you.
If you have questions – embarrassing or otherwise – please feel free to send them along to me at djensen@californiastemcellreport.com. Depending on your druthers, I will answer them in a private email or online here. If you prefer, you can post them anonymously by clicking on the word "comment" at the end of this item. I strongly believe that people who write on public walls – that includes all government agencies and CIRM as well as the media – should be prepared to be fully and publicly examined, even if it is uncomfortable or worse.
If you have suggestions or comment on the content, direction or tone of what appears on the California Stem Cell Report, please use the same methods of communication. I am looking forward to hearing from you.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Nature Says CIRM Faces 'Stark Choice" in New Chairman
Nature magazine today weighed in with its story on the nominations for the new chairman of the $3 billion California stem cell agency.
Writing on the publication's Spoonful of Medicine blog, Elie Dolgin said that the CIRM board of directors faces "a stark choice over who will lead the San Francisco-based institute as it enters into its next phase" – a cardiologist or bond financier.
The piece contrasted Frank Litvack's scientific and medical credentials with the investment background of Jonathan Thomas, who is chairman of a bond investment firm, Saybrook Capital in Santa Monic, Ca.
Dolgin reported that Thomas declined to comment on his salary request, which is reportedly at the top of the $400,000 range for the part-time job. Litvack is ready to take $137,500.
Meanwhile, the CIRM directors' Evaluation Subcommittee scheduled a June 3 meeting to interview the candidates. The session will be mostly closed but there is a provision for public comment at some time duiring the meeting.
The public can attend at locations in San Francisco, South San Francisco, Coronado in the San Diego area and Los Angeles. Specific addresses can be found on the agenda.
Writing on the publication's Spoonful of Medicine blog, Elie Dolgin said that the CIRM board of directors faces "a stark choice over who will lead the San Francisco-based institute as it enters into its next phase" – a cardiologist or bond financier.
The piece contrasted Frank Litvack's scientific and medical credentials with the investment background of Jonathan Thomas, who is chairman of a bond investment firm, Saybrook Capital in Santa Monic, Ca.
Dolgin reported that Thomas declined to comment on his salary request, which is reportedly at the top of the $400,000 range for the part-time job. Litvack is ready to take $137,500.
Meanwhile, the CIRM directors' Evaluation Subcommittee scheduled a June 3 meeting to interview the candidates. The session will be mostly closed but there is a provision for public comment at some time duiring the meeting.
The public can attend at locations in San Francisco, South San Francisco, Coronado in the San Diego area and Los Angeles. Specific addresses can be found on the agenda.
Minimal News Coverage on CIRM Chair Nominees
The latest news coverage of selection of a new leader for California's $3 billion stem cell agency is meager, to say the least.
Absent from the game this morning is most of the major media in the state, including the Los Angeles Times, the San Francisco Chronicle and the San Jose Mercury News. The Chronicle's and Mercury's backyards include the headquarters of CIRM, not to mention the major beneficiaries of the agency's largess. Oddly, The Sacramento Bee carried a story yesterday about the third nomination of Jon Thomas for chair of CIRM but failed to report the new nomination of Frank Litvack.
Here are links to the stories that searches by the California Stem Cell Report turned up this morning: Ron Leuty's piece in the San Francisco Business Times, Kathie Worth in the San Francisco Examiner and David Sider in The Bee.
Absent from the game this morning is most of the major media in the state, including the Los Angeles Times, the San Francisco Chronicle and the San Jose Mercury News. The Chronicle's and Mercury's backyards include the headquarters of CIRM, not to mention the major beneficiaries of the agency's largess. Oddly, The Sacramento Bee carried a story yesterday about the third nomination of Jon Thomas for chair of CIRM but failed to report the new nomination of Frank Litvack.
Here are links to the stories that searches by the California Stem Cell Report turned up this morning: Ron Leuty's piece in the San Francisco Business Times, Kathie Worth in the San Francisco Examiner and David Sider in The Bee.
Monday, May 23, 2011
Litvack vs. Thomas for Chair of the $3 Billion Stem Cell Agency
California State Controller John Chiang today nominated Frank Litvack, a "serial entrepreneur" and cardiologist, to become the new chairman of the $3 billion California stem cell agency.
Chiang cited Litvack's deep background in medical business development and "unique combination of skills." The controller said,
The controller continued,
Thomas was nominated last week by Gov. Jerry Brown and state Treasurer Bill Lockyer. Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom is also expected to nominate Thomas. (Later in the day, Newsom did nominate Thomas.)
By law, the 29-member CIRM board can only a elect a chairman from candidates nominated by the four state officials.
Thomas reportedly favors the current controversial dual executive situation at CIRM in which the chairman and president have overlapping responsibilities. That has lead to public conflict in the past and has been much criticized, particularly by the state's good government agency, the Little Hoover Commission. It said CIRM was personality driven.
Controller Chiang, also chair of the only state entity charged with review of CIRM and its board, last March said that oversight of CIRM is "severely compromised" when the chair is part of management.
Klein favors continuation of the existing dual executive relationship. A reliable source told the California Stem Cell Report that Klein favors Thomas, although the board's outside counsel denied that on behalf of Klein.
Litvack is disposed to more of an oversight role for the chair, a position that the CIRM board seems more inclined to support, at least as of its March meeting. The board also has designated the job as part-time – only 50 to 80 percent. The post carries a salary that tops out at $529,100. However, the board is looking at paying no more than $400,000 with a low of $137,500 because of its part-time nature.
The pay apparently is another difference between the two men. Thomas is reportedly seeking a salary at the high end of the range while Litvack would accept $137,500.
Litvack has been involved with a number of firms, most notably Conor Medsystems Inc. of Menlo Park, Ca. He was CEO when it was purchased by Johnson & Johnson for $1.4 billion. Conor was developing a new kind of stent.
Thomas' firm, which he co-founded, specializes in distressed and defaulted municipal bonds, a financial category that includes state bonds. The stem cell agency is funded virtually entirely by California state bonds. The state has the lowest bond rating of any state in the nation.
The CIRM directors' Evaluation Subcommittee is expected to meet behind closed doors soon to interview the candidates. They are expected to make a public presentation at the San Diego meeting at which time the public can make comments or raise questions.
Chiang cited Litvack's deep background in medical business development and "unique combination of skills." The controller said,
"Litvack knows from personal experience what it takes to develop new medical technologies and move them through the regulatory process to adoption in the market place."Chiang, the state's top fiscal officer, said that Litvack "has been a clinician, a researcher and an entrepreneur, who has found or led several medical technology companies."
The controller continued,
"Dr. Litvack is a strong proponent of the oversight model of governance, as I have advocated. I believe he has the executive, medical, regulatory and financing experience, as well as the leadership skills that are needed to successfully guide the ICOC (the CIRM governing board) and CIRM through this upcoming transition and onto further success in the coming years. His interest in serving as ICOC's next chair is grounded in such a strong sense of civic duty and belief in CIRM's mission of saving lives that he will serve in the position at the lowest salary being offered, irrespective of his commitment to spend whatever amount of time is necessary to work with the ICOC and CIRM management to ensure that the next chapter in CIRM's history is as successful as the first."The CIRM board will meet June 22 and 23 in San Diego to choose between Litvack and Jon Thomas, chairman of Saybrook Capital of Santa Monica, Ca., to succeed Robert Klein, a real estate investment banker and attorney who has resigned as chair of the organization.
Thomas was nominated last week by Gov. Jerry Brown and state Treasurer Bill Lockyer. Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom is also expected to nominate Thomas. (Later in the day, Newsom did nominate Thomas.)
By law, the 29-member CIRM board can only a elect a chairman from candidates nominated by the four state officials.
Thomas reportedly favors the current controversial dual executive situation at CIRM in which the chairman and president have overlapping responsibilities. That has lead to public conflict in the past and has been much criticized, particularly by the state's good government agency, the Little Hoover Commission. It said CIRM was personality driven.
Controller Chiang, also chair of the only state entity charged with review of CIRM and its board, last March said that oversight of CIRM is "severely compromised" when the chair is part of management.
Klein favors continuation of the existing dual executive relationship. A reliable source told the California Stem Cell Report that Klein favors Thomas, although the board's outside counsel denied that on behalf of Klein.
Litvack is disposed to more of an oversight role for the chair, a position that the CIRM board seems more inclined to support, at least as of its March meeting. The board also has designated the job as part-time – only 50 to 80 percent. The post carries a salary that tops out at $529,100. However, the board is looking at paying no more than $400,000 with a low of $137,500 because of its part-time nature.
The pay apparently is another difference between the two men. Thomas is reportedly seeking a salary at the high end of the range while Litvack would accept $137,500.
Litvack has been involved with a number of firms, most notably Conor Medsystems Inc. of Menlo Park, Ca. He was CEO when it was purchased by Johnson & Johnson for $1.4 billion. Conor was developing a new kind of stent.
Thomas' firm, which he co-founded, specializes in distressed and defaulted municipal bonds, a financial category that includes state bonds. The stem cell agency is funded virtually entirely by California state bonds. The state has the lowest bond rating of any state in the nation.
The CIRM directors' Evaluation Subcommittee is expected to meet behind closed doors soon to interview the candidates. They are expected to make a public presentation at the San Diego meeting at which time the public can make comments or raise questions.
Governor's Nomination Letter for Thomas
Here is the brief letter in which California Gov. Jerry Brown nominated Jon Thomas, chairman of Saybrook Capital of Santa Monica, to chair the $3 billion California stem cell agency.
Governor's Nomination of JonThomas
Governor's Nomination of JonThomas
Sunday, May 22, 2011
$700,000 IOM Study of California Stem Cell Agency to Begin July 1
The California stem cell agency has signed a nearly $700,000 contract with the prestigious Institute of Medicine to produce a wide-ranging report to determine whether the agency is operating at "peak performance" and whether improvements are needed.
The 17-month study will cost $699,247, under the terms of a contract signed on April 21. The project is scheduled to begin July 1 and conclude by Nov. 30, 2012. CIRM directors authorized the study last August.
The original proposed schedule would have had the study completed by September 2012. That date would have made it available that fall for use in a campaign for a possible $3 billion to $5 billion bond ballot measure for CIRM, which has been talked up by outgoing CIRM Chairman Robert Klein. Such bond measures are usually placed before voters during a major statewide election, such as for governor or president, in order to help win passage. A presidential election is set for November 2012.
Last August, Klein said the study would be key to winning voter approval of more bonds($3 billion were approved in 2004). However, the current timing would appear to make the full report unavailable for a November 2012 campaign. Nonetheless, selected portions of it could be leaked in advance to help win support.
Most of CIRM's directors agreed last August that a study by the well-regarded IOM would benefit CIRM and create more enthusiasm for stem cell research. The lone no vote came from Duane Roth, a San Diego businessman and co-vice chair of the board. He told directors,
Once it is written, the report will go through the National Research Council's peer review process. CIRM will see a prepublication copy of the report as much as three months ahead of publication.
Here are some of the questions that the IOM study proposes to address:
CIRM plans to pay for the study with funds that it has gathered over the last few years from private donors. Klein has argued that the money thus does not come from California taxpayers. However, as the California Stem Cell Report and others have pointed out, once the money is given to the state, it is all public money and belongs to taxpayers.
The IOM project comes as CIRM is scheduled to undergo its first-ever performance audit. The audit is required as the result of legislation last year supported by CIRM. The review is budgeted for $250,000 for the coming fiscal year although the total was originally estimated at about $400,000. Last fall, CIRM conducted an "external review" of its performance that consumed 2,000 hours or more of staff time.
The IOM study director is Cathy Liverman. The IOM contract and proposal can be read below.
IOM/CIRM Contract
IOM/CIRM Contract
The 17-month study will cost $699,247, under the terms of a contract signed on April 21. The project is scheduled to begin July 1 and conclude by Nov. 30, 2012. CIRM directors authorized the study last August.
The original proposed schedule would have had the study completed by September 2012. That date would have made it available that fall for use in a campaign for a possible $3 billion to $5 billion bond ballot measure for CIRM, which has been talked up by outgoing CIRM Chairman Robert Klein. Such bond measures are usually placed before voters during a major statewide election, such as for governor or president, in order to help win passage. A presidential election is set for November 2012.
Last August, Klein said the study would be key to winning voter approval of more bonds($3 billion were approved in 2004). However, the current timing would appear to make the full report unavailable for a November 2012 campaign. Nonetheless, selected portions of it could be leaked in advance to help win support.
Most of CIRM's directors agreed last August that a study by the well-regarded IOM would benefit CIRM and create more enthusiasm for stem cell research. The lone no vote came from Duane Roth, a San Diego businessman and co-vice chair of the board. He told directors,
"I would just caution that the outcome on something like this can cut both ways. And to go in just sort of blind trust that they're going reach the conclusion you want them to reach, I don't think is a foregone conclusion. So you at least ought to think about the downside of a rather critical (study)."The IOM's study proposal said,
"The principal objective of this review is to ensure that all aspects of CIRM's operations are functioning at peak performance."Under the terms of the contract, the IOM will select a 14-member committee to hold four meetings (only two that are partially public). The first meeting will be held behind closed doors although it deals with the very public issues of bias and conflict of interest. The second and third meetings are scheduled to have public workshops in California and will be the only ones held in the state.
Once it is written, the report will go through the National Research Council's peer review process. CIRM will see a prepublication copy of the report as much as three months ahead of publication.
Here are some of the questions that the IOM study proposes to address:
Although the study is being financed at taxpayer expense, the contract said the report will be the property of the the IOM – not CIRM. The contract also said "minutes and working papers from the committee meetings in closed (deliberative) sessions are considered proprietary by the consultant (the IOM) and will not be available for review by CIRM or provided to CIRM."
- "Does CIRM have the portfolio of projects and grant opportunïties necessary to meet its scientific goals?"
- "Are the internal organizational and management systems (in particular the board and working group structures and operations, the peer review system, the conflict of interest guidelines, and the grants management system) effective in working toward the institute's scientific goals?...Do they achieve the level of transparency and the level of stakeholder and scientific community involvement needed to meet the institute's public responsibilities and scientific goals?"
- "What are the advantages of CIRM's model for covering long-term costs of medical research? Could aspects of this funding model serve as a paradigm for other states or counties? "
CIRM plans to pay for the study with funds that it has gathered over the last few years from private donors. Klein has argued that the money thus does not come from California taxpayers. However, as the California Stem Cell Report and others have pointed out, once the money is given to the state, it is all public money and belongs to taxpayers.
The IOM project comes as CIRM is scheduled to undergo its first-ever performance audit. The audit is required as the result of legislation last year supported by CIRM. The review is budgeted for $250,000 for the coming fiscal year although the total was originally estimated at about $400,000. Last fall, CIRM conducted an "external review" of its performance that consumed 2,000 hours or more of staff time.
The IOM study director is Cathy Liverman. The IOM contract and proposal can be read below.
IOM/CIRM Contract
IOM/CIRM Contract
Friday, May 20, 2011
Newsom to Nominate Thomas for Chair of Stem Cell Agency
California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to nominate Southern California investor Jonathan Thomas for chair of the California stem cell agency, according to the San Francisco Business Times.
Reporter Ron Leuty cited an anonymous source in reporting the move today in his story on the nomination of Thomas by Gov. Jerry Brown and state Treasurer Bill Lockyer. State Controller John Chiang is yet to make his nomination.
In addition to Leuty, the Los Angeles Times and The Sacramento Bee today carried stories on their web sites about the nomination. The San Francisco and Los Angeles papers both cited coverage of the matter by the California Stem Cell Report.
Here are links to the stories in the Los Angeles paper (written by Eryn Brown) and The Bee(by Paresh Dave).
Here is a link to the Lockyer nominating letter, courtesy of The Bee. We hope to bring you Brown's 56-word letter during the weekend.
Reporter Ron Leuty cited an anonymous source in reporting the move today in his story on the nomination of Thomas by Gov. Jerry Brown and state Treasurer Bill Lockyer. State Controller John Chiang is yet to make his nomination.
In addition to Leuty, the Los Angeles Times and The Sacramento Bee today carried stories on their web sites about the nomination. The San Francisco and Los Angeles papers both cited coverage of the matter by the California Stem Cell Report.
Here are links to the stories in the Los Angeles paper (written by Eryn Brown) and The Bee(by Paresh Dave).
Here is a link to the Lockyer nominating letter, courtesy of The Bee. We hope to bring you Brown's 56-word letter during the weekend.
Prop. 71 Requirements for Chair of the California Stem Cell Agency
Here is the text of what Prop. 71 stipulates are the legal criteria for the CIRM chair.
"The chairperson and vice chairperson of ICOC (the CIRM governing board) shall be full or part time employees of the institute and shall meet the following criteria:
(A) Mandatory Chairperson Criteria
(i) Documented history in successful stem cell research advocacy.
(ii) Experience with state and federal legislative processes that must include some experience with medical legislative approvals of standards and/or funding.
(iii) Qualified for appointment pursuant to paragraph (3), (4), or (5) of subdivision (a)(which stipulate that the chair come from 'representatives' of 'disease advocacy' groups.) .
(iv) Cannot be concurrently employed by or on leave from any prospective grant or loan recipient institutions in California.
(B) Additional Criteria for Consideration:
(i) Experience with governmental agencies or institutions (either executive or board position).
(ii) Experience with the process of establishing government standards and procedures.
(iii) Legal experience with the legal review of proper governmental authority for the exercise of government agency or government institutional powers.
(iv) Direct knowledge and experience in bond financing."
Southern California Investor Nominated for Chair of the State's Stem Cell Agency
California Gov. Jerry Brown and the state's treasurer, Bill Lockyer, today nominated the head of a Southern California bond investment firm, Jonathan Thomas, as a candidate to become the new chairman of the $3 billion California stem cell agency.
Two other state officials, Controller John Chiang and Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, have the ability to nominate candidates to succeed Robert Klein at the research organization. However, they are yet to be heard from publicly.
Brown's nominating letter was very brief, only 56 words, and said nothing about Thomas other than nominating him.
Lockyer's letter was a bit longer. He said,
Thomas is reportedly favored by Klein as his replacement, although Klein has denied that through a spokesman. Thomas reportedly supports the much-criticized dual executive structure at CIRM in which the president and the chairman have overlapping responsibilities. Klein also favors continuation of the arrangement, which is codified in state law by Prop. 71. The ballot measure, which created by CIRM, was written by Klein and a handful of others.
The chairman's job carries a salary range that tops out at $529,100. However, the board earlier this year indicated that it was looking at no more than $400,000 for part-time work (up to 80 percent). Klein, an attorney and real estate investment banker, worked without salary for a number of years. At one point, he asked for compensation. The board approved a $150,000 salary for half-time work.
The board is expected to act on the nominations at its June 23 meeting in San Diego.
Two other state officials, Controller John Chiang and Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, have the ability to nominate candidates to succeed Robert Klein at the research organization. However, they are yet to be heard from publicly.
Brown's nominating letter was very brief, only 56 words, and said nothing about Thomas other than nominating him.
Lockyer's letter was a bit longer. He said,
"Mr. Thomas's experience as a public finance investment banker, attorney, board member of various government agencies, and board member of the Crippled Children's Society of Southern California, as well as his lifelong background, education and interest in biology and medical sciences, makes him exceptionally well-suited to fill the role of ICOC (the CIRM governing board) chair and to lead the ICOC into the next stages of its ongoing pursuit of cures through stem cell research."Thomas is chairman and co-founder of Saybrook Capital of Santa Monica, Ca., a firm that specializes in distressed and defaulted municipal bonds, an investment category that includes state bonds. The stem cell agency is funded by California state bonds. The state has the lowest bond rating of any state in the nation.
Thomas is reportedly favored by Klein as his replacement, although Klein has denied that through a spokesman. Thomas reportedly supports the much-criticized dual executive structure at CIRM in which the president and the chairman have overlapping responsibilities. Klein also favors continuation of the arrangement, which is codified in state law by Prop. 71. The ballot measure, which created by CIRM, was written by Klein and a handful of others.
The chairman's job carries a salary range that tops out at $529,100. However, the board earlier this year indicated that it was looking at no more than $400,000 for part-time work (up to 80 percent). Klein, an attorney and real estate investment banker, worked without salary for a number of years. At one point, he asked for compensation. The board approved a $150,000 salary for half-time work.
The board is expected to act on the nominations at its June 23 meeting in San Diego.
Seattle Gilead Exec Is Potential Candidate for Chair of California Stem Cell Agency
A third candidate and possibly a fourth has emerged for nomination as the new chairman of the $3 billion California stem cell agency.
One is Bruce Montgomery, an executive in Washington state with Gilead Sciences, Inc., of Foster City, Ca., reliable sources told the California Stem Cell Report. The other is Stephen Juelsgaard of Woodside, Ca. He is a former executive with Genentech who was appointed to the CIRM board recently. His appointment may indicate that he is not actively seeking to replace Robert Klein, who is resigning as chairman.
Scuttlebutt has it that Montgomery is favored by CIRM President Alan Trounson. Montgomery is senior vice president for respiratory therapeutics at Gilead. He was the founder and CEO of Corus Pharma of Seattle when it was purchased by Gilead in 2006. Prior to that he was an executive with Patho Genesis Corp. and worked at Genentech.
Montgomery was also once chairman of the Washington State Biotechnology and Biomedical Association. He is a physician with an active California license.
Juelsgaard's appointment to the board does not rule him out as a candidate for chair, but it would seem to make his possible nomination more awkward.
The other potential nominees whose names have surfaced are Frank Litvack, former CEO of Conor, and Jonathan Thomas, chairman of Saybrook Capital of Santa Monica, Ca.
Four statewide officials are charged with nominating candidates. The officials are the governor, treasurer, controller and lieutenant governor. Their nominations are expected on Monday if not sooner. The CIRM board can only choose among the nominees. The board is expected to take up the matter at a meeting in San Diego June 23.
 |
| Bruce Montgomery |
Scuttlebutt has it that Montgomery is favored by CIRM President Alan Trounson. Montgomery is senior vice president for respiratory therapeutics at Gilead. He was the founder and CEO of Corus Pharma of Seattle when it was purchased by Gilead in 2006. Prior to that he was an executive with Patho Genesis Corp. and worked at Genentech.
Montgomery was also once chairman of the Washington State Biotechnology and Biomedical Association. He is a physician with an active California license.
Juelsgaard's appointment to the board does not rule him out as a candidate for chair, but it would seem to make his possible nomination more awkward.
The other potential nominees whose names have surfaced are Frank Litvack, former CEO of Conor, and Jonathan Thomas, chairman of Saybrook Capital of Santa Monica, Ca.
Four statewide officials are charged with nominating candidates. The officials are the governor, treasurer, controller and lieutenant governor. Their nominations are expected on Monday if not sooner. The CIRM board can only choose among the nominees. The board is expected to take up the matter at a meeting in San Diego June 23.
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Cardiologist/Entrepreneur Eyed for Stem Cell Agency Chair
 |
Frank Litvack Cedars Photo |
He is Frank Litvack, former CEO of of Conor Medsystems Inc. of Menlo Park, Inc., which was purchased by Johnson & Johnson for $1.4 billion in 2006. Conor developed what Business Week called a "new breed of stent."
Several sources told the California Stem Cell Report that Litvack is one of several possibilities to replace Robert Klein, who is resigning effective June 23, as chairman of CIRM.
Four statewide officials are scheduled to make nominations for the post on Monday. At one point earlier this year, it appeared that there would be an effort to have the four nominate one person. However, that attempt has fallen by the way. John M. Simpson, stem cell project director at Consumer Watchdog of Santa Monica, Ca., said,
"There will definitely be choices."The 29-member CIRM board is expected to vote on the candidates at its meeting June 23 in San Diego. The CIRM directors Evaluation Subcommittee is expected to schedule a closed door meeting to interview candidates, who will make public presentations to the full board probably at the June meeting. At that time, the public will have an opportunity to comment.
The California Stem Cell Report disclosed yesterday that Jonathan Thomas, chairman of the Saybrook Capital of Santa Monica, Ca., is also under consideration as a candidate. Thomas is reportedly backed by Klein, although Klein has denied that via a spokesman.
Thomas is believed to support the current dual-executive structure at CIRM with overlapping responsibilities involving the chair and the president. The structure has been strongly criticized and has created public conflict in the past. Litvack reportedly favors a role that would place the chair instead in more of an oversight role.
Litvack has a slight connection already to the CIRM board. He and Sherry Lansing, chair of the CIRM Governance Committee, both serve on the Health Board of Advisors at RAND, a Santa Monica, Ca., thinktank.
In 2005 while Litvack was head of Conor, Business Week wrote about how the firm provided stock options to some doctors evaluating its technology, which was well-regarded.
The magazine said,
"Yet Conor's technology is difficult to assess, in part because some doctors helping to evaluate the devices have received stock options from the company. Among the 14 doctors who sit on Conor's scientific advisory board and are participating in clinical trials of its stent, three received consulting fees and five have received options, according to documents obtained by BusinessWeek.According to Bloomberg Business Week, Litvack is managing director of Calmedica Capital LP and a director of Nile Therapeutics Inc. and Pervasis Therapeutics Inc. From 1986 to 2000, he co-directed the Cardiovascular Intervention Center at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. He has also founded Progressive Angioplasty Systems Inc., and co-founded itherX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
"Such relationships are a growing source of concern in the medical-device industry, drawing increasing scrutiny from regulators and medical ethicists. Still, Wall Street is smitten with Conor's potential."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)