With more than 3.0 million page views and more than 5,000 items, this blog provides news and commentary on public policy, business and economic issues related to the $3 billion California stem cell agency. David Jensen, a retired California newsman, has published this blog since January 2005. His email address is djensen@californiastemcellreport.com.
Wednesday, January 29, 2014
Genomics Center Discussion Begins
Deliberations in the $40 million genomics round at the California stem cell agency have begun.
California's Stem Cell Directors Back at Work
Directors of the California stem cell agency have resumed their meeting and expect to take up the $40 million genomics round after dealing with three brief items.
California Stem Cell Directors Working Through Lunch
Directors of the California stem cell agency are fetching their meals for a working lunch as they continue with their agenda at their meeting in Berkeley. Still to be heard are applications in the $40 million genomics round.
Just prior to lunch, the directors paid tribute to Michael Goldberg, who is leaving the board after serving since its inception in 2004. In his remarks after hearing his colleagues and noting the arduous history of the agency, he said,
Just prior to lunch, the directors paid tribute to Michael Goldberg, who is leaving the board after serving since its inception in 2004. In his remarks after hearing his colleagues and noting the arduous history of the agency, he said,
"They tried to kill us. They failed. Let's eat."
$27 Million Approved for Basic Stem Cell Research in California
Directors of the California stem cell today approved, 11-0, about $27 million for basic research into workings of stem cells.
The round was originally budgeted for $40 million, but grant reviewers did not approve grants that would have required that level of funding.
Reviewers recommended 21 grants for approval for a total of $21 million. CIRM staff recommended another five costing $4.8 million. The 29-member board added another two grants totaling $1.1 million.
The board rejected other pitches by reviewer-rejected applicants for reconsideration. The stem cell agency later today is expected to release the names of all the winners. It never releases the names of rejected applicants.
(Here is a link to the CIRM press release with the names of the winners.)
The round was originally budgeted for $40 million, but grant reviewers did not approve grants that would have required that level of funding.
Reviewers recommended 21 grants for approval for a total of $21 million. CIRM staff recommended another five costing $4.8 million. The 29-member board added another two grants totaling $1.1 million.
The board rejected other pitches by reviewer-rejected applicants for reconsideration. The stem cell agency later today is expected to release the names of all the winners. It never releases the names of rejected applicants.
(Here is a link to the CIRM press release with the names of the winners.)
Stem Cell Ethics to be Examined in March
In its $700,000 study of the California stem cell agency, the Institute of Medicine recommended that it finance more work dealing with ethical issues in stem cell research.
Today, CIRM President Alan Trounson announced that the agency was participating in a workshop in Berkeley in March. The above chart was presented at the meeting of governing board of the agency this morning.
For more information, email the agency at info@cirm.ca.gov
$21 Million of Basic Research Being Discussed by Stem Cell Agency
Directors of the California stem cell agency have begun discussion of applications in its grant round involving basic biology research. The board is expected to award at least $21 million in this round.
Conflicts Listed in Upcoming Voting in California's $40 Million Genomics Round
Here is a list of members of the governing board of the California stem cell and the conflicts of interest that exist on each application in the $40 million genomics round.
The list was provided by the stem cell agency at the request of the California Stem Cell Report.
The members listed in each row are are barred from voting on the grant listed in the far left column. (Following the first posting of this list, the agency said, "Steve Juelsgaard is erroneously listed as being in conflict with genomics application 6683 under the Data and Coordination Management category." Later in the day, the agency also reported another error. "Jacob Levin is included for application 6708, but does not have a conflict.")
The list was provided by the stem cell agency at the request of the California Stem Cell Report.
The members listed in each row are are barred from voting on the grant listed in the far left column. (Following the first posting of this list, the agency said, "Steve Juelsgaard is erroneously listed as being in conflict with genomics application 6683 under the Data and Coordination Management category." Later in the day, the agency also reported another error. "Jacob Levin is included for application 6708, but does not have a conflict.")
A Reading List for California's $40 Million Stem Cell Genomics Round
Here are links to recent stories dealing with the California stem cell agency's $40 million stem cell genomics round -- a plan to make the state the world leader in the new field.
Thursday Jan. 23, 2014
California's Stem Cell Genomics Awards: An Untidy Affair
The California stem cell agency's $40 million genomics round seems to be turning into a bit of a muddle.
Friday Jan. 24, 2014
Stanford Genomics Consortium Likely Winner in $33 Million Stem Cell Agency Project
A seven-member consortium led by Stanford University's Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine is expected next week to win a $33 million award from the California stem cell agency to create a stem cell genomics center.
Saturday Jan. 25, 2014
California's $40 Million Genomics Round: Charges of Unfairness, Factual Error and More
Scientists at two major California research institutions have leveled charges that the state stem cell agency's $40 million genomics round is tainted with unfair and non-scientific considerations along with factual errors, manipulation of scores and apparent preferential treatment.
Sunday Jan. 26, 2014
Thursday Jan. 23, 2014
California's Stem Cell Genomics Awards: An Untidy Affair
The California stem cell agency's $40 million genomics round seems to be turning into a bit of a muddle.
Friday Jan. 24, 2014
Stanford Genomics Consortium Likely Winner in $33 Million Stem Cell Agency Project
A seven-member consortium led by Stanford University's Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine is expected next week to win a $33 million award from the California stem cell agency to create a stem cell genomics center.
Saturday Jan. 25, 2014
California's $40 Million Genomics Round: Charges of Unfairness, Factual Error and More
Scientists at two major California research institutions have leveled charges that the state stem cell agency's $40 million genomics round is tainted with unfair and non-scientific considerations along with factual errors, manipulation of scores and apparent preferential treatment.
Sunday Jan. 26, 2014
Sacramento Bee: California Stem Cell Agency Betting Big on Genomics
The Sacramento Bee today published an article by the publisher of the California Stem Cell Report on this week's $40 million genomics round and its significance. The Associated Press picked up the story and distributed it nationally.
Sunday Jan. 26, 2014
Alan Trounson's Opaque Messages, Genomics and $40 Million
Cryptic is probably a good word for the messages delivered last week by the president of the California stem cell agency, Alan Trounson, in his recommendations in the agency's $40 million genomics round. Odd might be another.
Monday Jan. 27, 2014
California's $40 Million Genomics Round and Conflicts of Interest
Concerns about conflicts of interest have dogged the California stem cell agency since its earliest days, and they continue into this week's $40 million genomics round.
Monday Jan. 27, 2014
California's $40 Million Genomics Awards: Stem Cell Agency Defends its Review Practices
The California stem cell agency today defended itself against charges that scoring on grant applications was manipulated in its $40 million genomics grant round to the benefit of a consortium headed by Stanford University researchers.
The Sacramento Bee today published an article by the publisher of the California Stem Cell Report on this week's $40 million genomics round and its significance. The Associated Press picked up the story and distributed it nationally.
Sunday Jan. 26, 2014
Alan Trounson's Opaque Messages, Genomics and $40 Million
Cryptic is probably a good word for the messages delivered last week by the president of the California stem cell agency, Alan Trounson, in his recommendations in the agency's $40 million genomics round. Odd might be another.
Monday Jan. 27, 2014
California's $40 Million Genomics Round and Conflicts of Interest
Concerns about conflicts of interest have dogged the California stem cell agency since its earliest days, and they continue into this week's $40 million genomics round.
Monday Jan. 27, 2014
California's $40 Million Genomics Awards: Stem Cell Agency Defends its Review Practices
The California stem cell agency today defended itself against charges that scoring on grant applications was manipulated in its $40 million genomics grant round to the benefit of a consortium headed by Stanford University researchers.
Wednesday Jan. 29, 2014
California Stem Cell Agency Withholds Key Information in $40 Million Genomics Proposals
California Stem Cell Agency Withholds Key Information in $40 Million Genomics Proposals
The
California stem cell agency has declined to disclose publicly a
critical criteria – the amount of matching funds offered by each
applicant -- in its ambitious $40 million genomics round scheduled to
be acted on later today.
Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2014
The California Report -- Stem Cell Agency Puts $40 Million Up For Grabs in Genomic Research Grant This is a public radio show produced by KQED in San Francisco.
Wednesday Jan. 29, 2014
The California Report -- Stem Cell Agency Puts $40 Million Up For Grabs in Genomic Research Grant This is a public radio show produced by KQED in San Francisco.
Wednesday Jan. 29, 2014
Stanford Consortium Wins $40 Million to Create Stem Cell Genomics CenterDirectors of the California stem cell agency today approved a $40 million proposal ultimately targeted at creating medical treatments tailored to a patient's genetic makeup and making the state a world leader in stem cell genomics.
New CEO for California Stem Cell Agency in May
The California stem cell agency expects to make a decision on a candidate for a new president by May, the chairman of its governing board said this morning.
J.T. Thomas opened this morning's meeting by addressing the search for a new president to replace Alan Trounson, who has resigned but is serving temporarily.
Warren Roth, a representative of the Korn Ferry search firm, said that it expects to present candidates in late March. He said the board would be able to interview candidates in April.
The board has a regular meeting scheduled for May 29.
J.T. Thomas opened this morning's meeting by addressing the search for a new president to replace Alan Trounson, who has resigned but is serving temporarily.
Warren Roth, a representative of the Korn Ferry search firm, said that it expects to present candidates in late March. He said the board would be able to interview candidates in April.
The board has a regular meeting scheduled for May 29.
California Stem Cell Agency Opens Meeting to Discuss $40 Million Genomics Proposals
Directors of the California stem cell agency began their meeting today in Berkeley at 9:11 a.m. It is not yet clear at what time they will take up the proposals in the $40 million stem cell genomics round.
Stem Cell Agency Yet to Begin
Today's meeting of the governing board of the California stem cell agency appears to be a bit late in starting. We are checking on the situation.
California Stem Cell Agency Withholds Key Information in $40 Million Genomics Proposals
The California stem cell agency has
declined to disclose publicly a critical criteria – the amount of
matching funds offered by each applicant -- in its ambitious $40
million genomics round scheduled to be acted on later today.
A spokesman for the $3 billion state agency
yesterday said the figures were not a public record. However, the agency has public revealed such figures in the past.
The matching funds played a major role in the top ranking of a $33 million genomics proposal by a Stanford-led
consortium. Lack of matching funds also was deemed a serious problem
by the agency's grant reviewers, who operate behind closed doors, in
an application led by the Scripps Research Institute.
When asked for the figures, Kevin
McCormack, senior director for public communications, said,
“That is proprietary information, and so it's not available.”
He has not yet responded a follow-up
question about the rationale for cloaking such figures in secrecy
that goes beyond the simple assertion that they are proprietary.
Generally, proprietary information is considered to be trade secrets
or involve intellectual property or unique business methods.
Financing is commonly disclosed by
businesses and is even required by federal law when a company is
publicly traded.
Labels:
genomics,
grant making,
openness,
transparency
Tracking the Evolution of the Stem Cell Genomics Applicants
The plan to create one or two stem cell
genomics centers in California at a cost of $40 million began in
2012. Since then there have been some changes, some of which resulted
from the failure of reviewers to recommend any proposals in 2013.
Last week, the California Stem Cell
Report (CSCR) asked the California stem cell agency(CIRM), which is
scheduled to make a decision today on an at least one application,
about several of the changes. Here are the texts of the questions and
answers from the agency.
CSCR: Has the cast of applicants
changed since the initial review in early 2013? Have some dropped out
or been added? Have the applications been recast significantly for
the most recent review?
CIRM: Applicants to the first round of
review were eligible to participate in the second round. Although
review criteria remained the same as those stated in the RFA,
applicants were allowed to change proposal components, establish new
collaborations and/or combine efforts.
CSCR: How many letters of intent
(LOI) were received with a breakdown on the number from academic and
business enterprises? How many applications were received, also
with a breakdown on academic and business?
CIRM: For the first round, there were 9
LOI's; 7 of these submitted applications. No LOI was required
for the second round. All first round applicants participated
in the second round of competition, but several have combined
efforts, so there were 5 applications in the second round. Three
of these applications were collaborative proposals combining both
for-profit and not-for-profit organizations, while the other two were
from not-for-profit institutions.
Tuesday, January 28, 2014
Upcoming: Live and Complete Coverage of Tomorrow's $80 Million Stem Cell Meeting
Check in tomorrow on the California
Stem Cell Report for gavel-to-gavel coverage of the meeting of the
governing board of the $3 billion California stem cell agency. As
much as $80 million is at stake, including a $33 million plan by a
Stanford consortium to create a world-leading stem cell genomics
center.
The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9
a.m. PST. Coverage will begin at that time with stories filed as
developments warrant.
For those who want to attend the event,
it will be in Berkeley. Teleconference locations are in La Jolla and
Los Angeles. The meeting will be audiocast on the Internet with a
WebEx transmission of documents that are displayed for the board.
Full instructions are on the meeting agenda along with the addresses
of the teleconference locations and the actual meeting.
Goldberg Departs from California Stem Cell Board; Panetta and Miller Join
The California stem cell agency is
losing another of the original members of its governing board but two
new ones with markedly different backgrounds will be joining the
29-member panel tomorrow.
Departing is Michael Goldberg, a venture capitalist from the San Francisco Bay area. He has served as
head of the board's finance subcommittee. Along with Marcy Feit,
another longtime board member, he has cleaned up the accounting
mess
that once made the $3 billion agency's operational budget nearly
incomprehensible.
Michael Goldberg Mobihealth News photo |
In response to a question from the
California Stem Cell Report, Goldberg said,
"John Thomas's leadership (as agency board chairman) has long been firmly established and it is now time for me to step aside to allow for a new appointee to contribute to taking CIRM to the next level.
"I will be forever indebted to have had the privilege to serve my fellow Californians as a member of the ICOC(the agency governing board). As a patient advocate and member of industry I am extraordinarily proud of what CIRM has accomplished to date and enormously enthusiastic about our future prospects for improving patient care and bettering the health care economics of our state."
Joe Panetta Biocom photo |
Panetta, however, does not fit that
category. He is a longtime figure in the biotech community in California. He has been head of Biocom, the life sciences industry
association in the San Diego area, since 1999. He fills the vacancy
left by the death of Duane Roth, who was also came from the San Diego business
community.
Lauren Miller Ivan Nikolov/WENN photo |
CIRM quoted Miller in a press release
as saying,
“To have the opportunity to learn about, and support the research for so many important diseases is such a great honor and responsibility and I look forward to starting.”
The agency also said,
“Miller’s commitment to raising awareness about Alzheimer’s comes from her family’s battle against the disease. Her grandfather died of Alzheimer’s and her mother was diagnosed with it when she was just 55 years old.”
Miller replaces Leeza Gibbons, another
celebrity who is a patient advocate for Alzheimer's.
$21 Million Likely for California's Basic Stem Cell Research
Directors of the California stem cell
agency tomorrow are expected to approve at least $21 million for
basic research into “significant, unresolved issues in human stem
cell biology.”
The round was originally slated for $40
million but grant reviewers decided to fund only 20 applications out
of 62. The round began with 341 scientists filing pre-applications.
(Here is a link to reviewers' summaries
and rankings as well as a link to the CIRM staff's Power Pointpresentation.)
CIRM President Alan Trounson and his
staff recommended approval of five additional applications totaling$4.8 million. The rationale in their recommendations could be
considered fulsome compared to what Trounson offered on the $40
million genomics round also to be considered tomorrow.
Five additional researchers filed
letters with the CIRM governing board seeking its approval. Those
letters can be found on the agenda for tomorrow's meeting. Seven researchers filed formal appeals with the CIRM, which are
now dealt with behind closed doors by the agency's staff.
The 20 applicants given the nod by
reviewers were placed in a tier one category that is virtually
certain to be approved by the board with no debate. Others were
ranked in a wobbler category called tier two, meaning it could go
either way for the scientists. The remainder fell into tier three –
not recommended for funding by reviewers.
The board is increasingly turning to
proposals that will turn more advanced research into clinical
treatments. If directors do not go for spending the entire $40
million budgeted, they would save money that could be used for
clinical trials. However, aside from the general arguments for doing
basic research, those grants provide large sums to recipient
institutions to pay for their overhead. And many of the agency's
board members come from institutions that could benefit from payments
for those overhead costs. Those board members will not be allowed to
vote on applications involving their institutions.
(Editor's note: The number of researchers filing formal appeals was not contained in an earlier version of this article.)
(Editor's note: The number of researchers filing formal appeals was not contained in an earlier version of this article.)
California's Stem Cell CEO Search: Dangling a 16-page Lure
The California stem cell agency
yesterday posted what could be called a recruiting brochure for the
effort to hire a new president to replace Alan Trounson.
The document, which was prepared by the search firm Korn Ferry, is couched in language designed to stimulate interest in those seeking a challenge and
opportunity.
- “Few technologies have captured the imagination of the public quite like human stem cells,” the brochure begins.
- “Transformative public funding,” it says at one point.
- “One of the most influential agencies in the universe of stem cell research,” it says at another.
It is also surprisingly forthright about the
longstanding and controversial problem of the dual executive
arrangement decreed by law. It may be the first time that the agency
has so directly admitted publicly and formally that the overlapping
responsibilities of the president and chairman have caused serious
difficulties.
The document says,
“This unique partnership has amply demonstrated its value when the president and chair have worked well together, but the organization has suffered when this has not been the case. An ability to adapt to this model of governance and management will be a critical attribute for the next president.”
The CIRM/Korn Ferry brochure is explicit about the direction of the agency towards pushing therapies into the marketplace and clinic. That is significant because of continuing pressures to well fund basic research, which means less money for efforts that are closer to clinical use. The document says,
"With the remaining resources of the state’s commitment, it is CIRM’s intention to focus its funding decisions increasingly on a host of projects with particular clinical promise, bringing the science it has strategically cultivated to the fruition of human therapy. Both the governing board and the staff of CIRM are committed to this pivot in organizational priorities, driven to fulfill the dream of the people of the State...."It is unclear when a new president will be on the scene. There is talk about a hire being made by April or May, but having the new person actually in the office five or more days a week could be a different matter. Trounson said last November he would stay on for awhile. But his family remains in Australia, where he is seeking to return.
The directors' Presidential Search Subcommittee meets tonight in Berkeley to discuss the brochure, which the agency labels a "candidate position statement." Korn Ferry has a $160,000 contract with the agency. The agency has previously used search firms in its presidential recruitment. None of them have come up with the person that was ultimately hired.
Teleconference locations where the public can comment are available
in Costa Mesa, La Jolla and San Francisco. Specific addresses can be found on the agenda.
(Editor's note: The three sentences on the size of the Korn Ferry contract and the success of previous search firms were not contained in an earlier version of this story.)
(Editor's note: The three sentences on the size of the Korn Ferry contract and the success of previous search firms were not contained in an earlier version of this story.)
Inside Stem Cell HQ: A Look at the Tiny Staff
The staff of the $3 billion California
stem cell agency is small – very small.
Cynthia Schaffer CIRM photo |
At one point point midway in its
history, they probably probably amounted no more than the number of workers at your
average Burger King. Today the staff even outnumbers the 29 persons who sit
on its governing board. At one point in years past, it did not.
The staff has had its share of
turnovers, but there is something certainly different about its
esprit compared to most state agencies.
Yesterday, one of its longtime
staffers, Cynthia Schaffer, wrote a little about the nuts-and-bolts
operations and the nearly 60 persons who work at stem cell HQ at 210 King
Street, across the street from the the San Francisco Giants baseball
park. Her item appeared on the agency's blog. Check it out.
Monday, January 27, 2014
California's $40 Million Genomics Awards: Stem Cell Agency Defends its Review Practices
The California stem cell agency today
defended itself against charges that scoring on grant applications was manipulated in its $40 million genomics grant round to the
benefit of a consortium headed by Stanford University researchers.
In response to a query from the
California Stem Cell Report, the agency said its practices were
“consistent with many previous reviews.” The agency also said
that its RFA specifically allowed the adjustments that were made by the agency.
In a letter to the agency's board,
Pui-Yan Kwok, leader of a proposal offered by UC San Francisco
and UC Berkeley, had challenged the scoring on a $33 million proposal
from the Stanford consortium. If the board goes along with reviewers
and CIRM President Alan Trounson, Stanford's application will be the
only one approved on Wednesday at the board meeting in Berkeley.
Trounson has recommended to the board
that it not fund three other applications that were approved for
funding by reviewers. He offered no rationale for his recommendation. The board, however, has almost never rejected positive recommendations from its reviewers on hundreds of applications during the last nine years.
Here is the full text of the agency's
response as delivered by Kevin McCormack, senior director of public
communications.
“I think the UCSF researcher was mistaken when he said: 'We were surprised to see that the genomic center scores of the top two applications were based on the reviewers removing from consideration the poorest performing center-initiated projects. The fact that the reviewers could propose removal of individual center-initiated projects was never mentioned in the RFA.'
“Because the RFA specifically states: 'The GWG will make funding recommendations to the ICOC concerning which Centers and which Center-initiated projects (within a particular award) to fund. The GWG may also make specific recommendations concerning the budget for each proposed award. The ICOC will make final funding decisions.'
“This practice is consistent with many previous reviews in which the GWG recommended removal of distinct Specific Aims or proposed activities.
“Also in the letter, the UCSF researcher says: 'Even more appalling is that this was applied only to the two applications (that) ended up with the highest scores. The end result is that two centers' scores were artificially inflated to 88 and 82, respectively. Despite this uneven application of the review process, two other applications received Tier 1 (recommended for funding) scores. This appearance of preferential treatment makes the process suspect.'
“However, reviewers were instructed that they could recommend removal of specific Center Initiated Projects (provided that at least 2 remain) if they felt this action would strengthen the overall proposal. This option was available for every application considered.
“For proposals where there was no recommendation to remove Center Initiated Projects, reviewers did not believe that the overall score would be significantly increased by such removal.”
California's $40 Million Genomics Round and Conflicts of Interest
Concerns about
conflicts of interest have dogged the California stem cell agency since its earliest days, and they continue into this week's $40
million genomics round.
They were first raised in the ballot
campaign of 2004 when California voters were asked to create the $3
billion research program. And they were of sufficient concern eight
years later that the highly regarded Institute of Medicine said in a $700,000 study of the agency that it should act to minimize potential damage.
The institute said in its 2012 report,
commissioned by the agency itself,
“Far too many board members represent organizations that receive CIRM funding or benefit from that funding. These competing personal and professional interests compromise the perceived independence of the ICOC(the governing board), introduce potential bias into the board’s decision making, and threaten to undermine confidence in the board.
The latest concerns arise, however,
not in connection with the governing board. They have surfaced
in connection with the closed-door grant review process and subsequent
recommendations by CIRM President Alan Trounson in a plan to create one or two stem cell genomic
centers. Trounson advised the board to approve $33 million for a
single proposal led by researchers at Stanford University.
Two applicants in the genomics round,
UC San Francisco and the Scripps Research Institute, have complained in letters to the agency's board about unfairness, apparent preferential treatment and manipulation of scores on the Stanford
application, among other things. The applicants do not specifically
allege that conflicts of interest exist in the genomics round. Nor do
they identify a motive behind what one applicant said were
“appalling” actions.
But the round has a checkered history
that does, in fact, involve actual conflicts of interest. connected to
Trounson, CIRM grant reviewer Lee Hood of Seattle and Stanford stem
cell researcher Irv Weissman. Some concerns were also voiced
privately by researchers as far back as 2012 when renown genomics researcher Craig
Venter, now part of the Stanford application in this week's round,
pitched the CIRM board on stem cell genomics. Only an hour or two
following his presentation, the board, with virtually no discussion,
approved the concept behind the genomics round along with a $40
million budget. Approval came on a voice vote with no dissent.
Applications came in about eight months
later for what CIRM said would be one or two awards that would propel
California into a world class leadership position in the new field.
Trounson recruited Hood, who is another internationally recognized
genomics expert, to serve as a grant reviewer. As reported by the California Stem Cell Report in May 2013, one reviewer in the first of
two genomics grant review sessions raised a question about Hood's
participation. Hood subsequently acknowledged that he failed to
disclose his relationship with Weissman, who was involved in what was
then a $24 million application from Stanford. The men are friends
and partners on a ranch in Montana. CIRM staff had failed to detect
the conflict.
Prior to the genomics round Trounson
had acknowledged he had a conflict-of-interest in connection with another Weissman-related proposal. In 2012 in a round not related to
genomics, Trounson, who has visited the Hood-Weissman ranch as
Weissman's guest, recused himself from the board's public discussions
of applications from StemCells, Inc., a company founded by Weissman.
Under CIRM's procedures, Trounson does
not vote on applications during the review process. But beginning
last year the board gave him and his staff new authority to make
recommendations on applications after they were acted on by
reviewers.
Following the Hood violation, the
proposals were sent back to scientists for resubmission. By the time Stanford's proposal was
approved by reviewers and came to Trounson for his consideration,
Stanford had removed Weissman's name. According to a letter from Stanford, the associate director of Weissman's stem cell institute at
Stanford, Michael Clarke, is now a “collaborator” on the project.
In documents on the CIRM Web site,
Trounson also told the board, with no explanation, that it should not
approve any cash for the applications for two competing proposals
from UC San Francisco and Scripps and a third believed to be from
UCLA. All three were recommended for funding by CIRM's blue-ribbon
reviewers, all of whom are from out of state. Normally the board has
rubber-stamped hundreds of such recommendations by reviewers. It
would be a radical change for the board to turn its back on
reviewers' opinions on three major proposals.
The California Stem Cell Report asked
the agency last week whether all staff members, including Trounson, who were involved in the
recommendations were screened for “personal, professional and
financial conflicts.”
Kevin McCormack, senior director of
communications for the agency, replied,
“Dr. Trounson’s participation in the staff recommendations regarding the stem cell genomics award was consistent with state law and CIRM policies.”
McCormack also said that the CIRM legal
staff “ensured, as they always do, that employees with conflicts
did not participate in the review of applications in which they had a
conflict.”
Our take:
It is not unreasonable to consider that Clarke, the associate director of Weissman's institute, is a surrogate for Weissman in the Stanford proposal and presents at the very least the appearance of a conflict of interest for Trounson
The situation does not well serve the agency, which is in the process of trying to develop funding for its operations after 2017, when money for new grants will run out. Prospective investors, be they private or public, would expect the agency to act in such a manner that would avoid the sort of flap that has arisen in the genomics round. That is not to mention the need to maintain the confidence of the public and the stem cell community.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)