The key issue is whether the agency is
satisfied that the Newark, Ca., firm can provide $40 million in
matching funds that it promised under the terms of two $20 million
awards approved in late July and early September. The September award
was approved on a 7-5 vote by agency directors after it was rejected twice by CIRM reviewers.
In response to a query by the
California Stem Cell Report, Kevin McCormack, an agency spokesman,
yesterday said the company and CIRM have not reached agreement.
CIRM directors okayed the September
award in an appeals process that used a mechanism called
“extraordinary petitions.” Last week, a blue-ribbon, Institute of
Medicine study of the agency said the petitions should be abolished
because they damage the integrity of the grant review process.
The September approval was the first
time that agency directors approved an application that was rejected
twice by reviewers. The action followed two appearances by the former
chairman of the agency, Robert Klein, on behalf of StemCells, Inc. It
was his first such appearance on behalf of an applicant.
The StemCells, Inc., award also
triggered a column in the Los Angeles Times by Pulitzer Prize-winning
columnst Michael Hiltzik. He wrote
that the process was “redolent of cronyism” and said a
“charmed relationship” existed among StemCells, Inc., its
“powerful friends” and the stem cell agency.
StemCells, Inc., stock price reached a
52-week high on Sept. 4 of $2.67, well up from its 52-week low of 59
cents June 4. The stock was trading at $1.78 at the time of this
writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment