The audiocast for the meeting this morning of the governing board of the California stem cell agency is now up. Be sure to use the correct code to sign in(there are two different ones). This writer did not and initially received yesterday's audiocast.
The board is currently discussing the "bolt-on" changes re grants.
With more than 3.0 million page views and more than 5,000 items, this blog provides news and commentary on public policy, business and economic issues related to the $3 billion California stem cell agency. David Jensen, a retired California newsman, has published this blog since January 2005. His email address is djensen@californiastemcellreport.com.
Thursday, September 06, 2012
CIRM Governing Board Meeting: Audiocast Problems
Today's meeting of the governing board of the $3 billion California stem cell agency should be getting underway shortly. For those of you interested in the live Internet audiocast, the voice you are now hearing on that service is that of CIRM President Alan Trounson. The audiocast is a repeat from the beginning of yesterday's session. We have queried the agency about the status of the audiocast, which is performed by ATT.
StemCells, Inc., Hails $40 Million in Awards from California Stem Cell Agency
StemCells, Inc., was quick this morning
with a press release about winning a $20 million award last night from the
California stem cell agency.
The publicly traded, Newark, Ca., firm
also pointed out that the CIRM board in July awarded another $20
million to the business.
The news release hailed the awards as
validating its science and business. Martin McGlynn, who personally
appeared before the CIRM board last night, said,
"CIRM's approval of two awards to StemCells illustrates the tremendous promise of our neural stem cell technology and the high degree of confidence in the world class team of scientists and clinicians who will be working to translate this technology into potential treatments and cures for these devastating diseases."
On the Alzheimer's award last night,
McGlynn said,
"With the recent spate of late-stage clinical failures in Alzheimer's disease, it is clear that the field could benefit from alternative approaches to lessen the huge burden on families, caregivers and our healthcare system.
He continued,
"Our recently reported preclinical data, which showed that our neural stem cells restored memory and enhanced synaptic function in two animal models relevant to Alzheimer's disease, shows our approach has promise. We greatly appreciate the support from CIRM, which should help us accelerate our efforts to test our HuCNS-SC cells in Alzheimer's disease."
The news release did not note that the
board has required that the firm must show proof that it has access
to $20 million in matching funds prior to receiving cash from the
agency on the Alzheimer's grant. The California Stem Cell Report is
asking CIRM whether that requirement extends to the earlier grant as
well.
One of the analysts who follows the
company released a special report on the firm this morning. Stephen
Dunn of LifeTech Capital said,
“We are reiterating our strong speculative buy with a price target of $4.50 as StemCells Inc. continues to distinguishing themselves as one of the most advanced players in the stem cell space.”
At the time of this writing, the firm's
stock was trading at $2.20 up seven cents. Its 52 week high is $2.67
and its 52 week low is 59 cents.
Wednesday, September 05, 2012
CIRM Board Adjourns
The governing board of the California stem cell agency adjourned at 9:56 p.m. PDT today and will reconvene tomorrow morning at 9 a.m. PDT. The California Stem Cell Report will provide coverage of the daylong meeting then. No further items are expected this evening.
StemCells, Inc., Wins Another $20 Million From California Stem Cell Agency
Following a second impassioned pitch by its former chairman, Robert Klein, the governing board of the California stem cell agency approved a $20 million award to a financially strapped biotech firm, StemCells, Inc., of Newark, Ca.
Approval came on a 7-5 vote with the condition that the company demonstrate it has access to $20 million in matching funds prior to funding. It is the second $20 million award that the company has received in the disease team round, which now totals $214 million. Another disease team application has been tabled and will not be considered until October.
The current CIRM chairman, J.T. Thomas, a Los Angeles bond financier, asked for the financial proof because he said some concerns were expressed during an executive session that CIRM would now "account for such a large part of the assets of the company." Martin McGlynn, CEO of StemCells, Inc., also told the board that the company might have to drop its Alzheimer's research if it did not receive the CIRM award.
The StemCells, Inc., application was rejected twice by reviewers. The original rejection came before the July meeting at which Klein first appeared (see here and here). The proposal was then sent back for re-review, during which it was rejected again.
However, the 29-member board narrowly approved the application following discussion tonight and following its rejection of another Alzheimer's research proposal from USC. Both applicants produced a number of witnesses, including patients, on behalf of their appeals.
A footnote: The CIRM staff said that as a result of two StemCells application, a proposal is being prepared to limit applications to one per entity in later rounds.
Approval came on a 7-5 vote with the condition that the company demonstrate it has access to $20 million in matching funds prior to funding. It is the second $20 million award that the company has received in the disease team round, which now totals $214 million. Another disease team application has been tabled and will not be considered until October.
The current CIRM chairman, J.T. Thomas, a Los Angeles bond financier, asked for the financial proof because he said some concerns were expressed during an executive session that CIRM would now "account for such a large part of the assets of the company." Martin McGlynn, CEO of StemCells, Inc., also told the board that the company might have to drop its Alzheimer's research if it did not receive the CIRM award.
The StemCells, Inc., application was rejected twice by reviewers. The original rejection came before the July meeting at which Klein first appeared (see here and here). The proposal was then sent back for re-review, during which it was rejected again.
However, the 29-member board narrowly approved the application following discussion tonight and following its rejection of another Alzheimer's research proposal from USC. Both applicants produced a number of witnesses, including patients, on behalf of their appeals.
The re-review on the StemCells, Inc., application said in reference to a statement by Klein to board in July,
“The reviewers did not feel there was compelling data for neuron migration in the submitted manuscript. This is the manuscript specifically referenced at the ICOC (CIRM governing board) meeting (in July) that prompted the call for additional analysis. The manuscript is not yet accepted, it is 'potentially acceptable' but requires 'major revisions' according to the journal editor note. In addition, however, the studies in this manuscript used mouse NSCs, not the human NSCs proposed for the disease team award....”
In July, Klein said, “....(W)e have brand-new data that demonstrates and totally contradicts the key weakness on which it was downgraded.”
A footnote: The CIRM staff said that as a result of two StemCells application, a proposal is being prepared to limit applications to one per entity in later rounds.
Labels:
appeals,
disease team,
klein,
lobbying,
stem cell business
CIRM Executive Session on StemCells, Inc., Appeal
The governing board of the California stem cell agency is meeting in executive session to consider proprietary information on an appeal by StemCells, Inc., following a second public pitch by the agency's former chairman, Robert Klein, on behalf of the financially strapped business.
Martin McGlynn, CEO of the publicly traded firm, indicated to the board that it may have to drop its Alzheimer's research program if it does not receive the $20 million from CIRM.
The board's executive session followed rejection of another Alzheimer's related application, this one from researchers at USC.
Martin McGlynn, CEO of the publicly traded firm, indicated to the board that it may have to drop its Alzheimer's research program if it does not receive the $20 million from CIRM.
The board's executive session followed rejection of another Alzheimer's related application, this one from researchers at USC.
USC Loses Appeal on $20 Million Proposal
Directors of the California stem cell agency this evening rejected an application for a $20 million research grant to a team at the University of the Southern California.
The team, led by Roberta Diaz Brinton, filed an appeal last month in the $200 million disease team round, which first came up for consideration in July. CIRM staff pointed out that normally such appeals are considered at the time the round is first considered by the board.
The vote was split on the application, but actual tally was not announced by the agency following the vote. (Later, at the request of the California Stem Cell Report, a board spokesman said the vote was 4-10 on the 29-member board.)
Brinton and other investigators spoke to the board along with several patient advocates.
(An earlier version of this item did not contain the 4-10 vote.)
The team, led by Roberta Diaz Brinton, filed an appeal last month in the $200 million disease team round, which first came up for consideration in July. CIRM staff pointed out that normally such appeals are considered at the time the round is first considered by the board.
The vote was split on the application, but actual tally was not announced by the agency following the vote. (Later, at the request of the California Stem Cell Report, a board spokesman said the vote was 4-10 on the 29-member board.)
Brinton and other investigators spoke to the board along with several patient advocates.
(An earlier version of this item did not contain the 4-10 vote.)
UCLA's Nelson and Miceli Win $6 Million from California Stem Cell Agency
Directors of the California stem cell agency today approved a $6 million research grant for Stanley F. Nelson and M. Carrie Miceli of UCLA, who appealed a negative decision by grant reviewers on its earlier $20 million request.
Following a re-review of the proposal, a special CIRM panel recommended the lower amount and conversion of the proposal to an early translational grant instead of a disease team. The UCLA team will be asked to send a revised proposal to CIRM prior to funding.
Nelson told the board that he was "okay" with the revision and said his team would be back later for more funding for a larger project.
Following a re-review of the proposal, a special CIRM panel recommended the lower amount and conversion of the proposal to an early translational grant instead of a disease team. The UCLA team will be asked to send a revised proposal to CIRM prior to funding.
Nelson told the board that he was "okay" with the revision and said his team would be back later for more funding for a larger project.
UC Irvine's Klassen Wins $17.3 Million from California Stem Cell Agency
Directors of the California stem cell agency this evening approved a $17.3 million grant to Henry Klassen of UC Irvine following a re-review of the application in the agency's disease team round. The action came with no debate.
Capricor Wins $20 Million from California Stem Cell Agency
Directors of the California stem cell agency this evening approved an award of up to $20 million to Capricor, Inc., of Los Angeles, rejecting a negative decision on the application by agency reviewers.
Approval of the application came after a re-review triggered by Capricor's appeal in July. The governing board also declined to impose a staff-recommended condition dealing with the patient cohort.
Discussion of Disease Team Appeals Begins
The CIRM board is beginning the discussion of the appeals on disease team appeals. Thomas is reviewing the procedure for re-reviews of the applications.
Busy Agenda Tonight for CIRM Directors
CIRM Chairman J.T. Thomas just announced that he is going to try act tonight on most of the items on the agenda. Exceptions will be the basic biology grant, recruitment grant and resolutions, which will be taken up tomorrow. Discussion is now underway on the grants administration policy changes.
Routine Reports Being Heard at CIRM Directors Meeting
CIRM directors are now hearing routine financial and other reports from CIRM staff, including President Alan Trounson. The grant appeals have not yet been taken up.
CIRM Directors Meeting Begins
Directors of the $3 billion California stem cell agency have begun their meeting. However, the audiocast was down until just 20 minutes after the hour.
Upcoming Coverage of Action on $243 Million Disease Grants
The California Stem Cell Report will bring you gavel-to-gavel coverage this afternoon and evening of the meeting of the governing board of the $3 billion California stem cell agency. A spokesman says the primary order of business tonight will be finishing action on appeals in the $243 million disease team round and approval of changes in the grants administration policy. The meeting begins at 4 p.m. PDT. It resumes tomorrow at 9 a.m. PDT and is scheduled to go all day.
The session is being audiocast on the Internet. It is also accessible via an 800 number. Interested parties can participate from teleconference locations in La Jolla, Los Angeles and Pleasanton. Details are on the agenda.
The session is being audiocast on the Internet. It is also accessible via an 800 number. Interested parties can participate from teleconference locations in La Jolla, Los Angeles and Pleasanton. Details are on the agenda.
Appeals in $243 Million Stem Cell Round Climb to a Record 11
A Stanford researcher is seeking to
overturn reviewer rejection of his application for $20 million in the
California stem cell agency's largest ever research round and bringing to a record 11 the number of appeals in the round.
The previous record number of appeals in a round was nine in 2010. In the current $243 million disease team round, 11 of 15 applicants rejected by reviewers filed appeals, nine in July and two since then, including the Stanford researcher. Two of the appeals were successful in July. And it appears that three more appeals will be approved, albeit with conditions, later today.
In his petition to the agency's governing
board, Albert Wong of Stanford said,
“This science has been favorably reviewed by CIRM in the past and was on the cusp of funding. Moreover, three recent publications support our approach.”
He said that his team can “refute
nearly every negative comment made either through referencing
available scientific information or our application.” Additionally he indicated that his team
did not fully understand the opportunities for appeals during the
application review process.
Wong and CIRM did not disclose the
score on the application (5373), but it was listed next to last on
the CIRM list of reviewer summaries. Generally, those summaries are
listed in order of their scientific score ranking.
Wong's appeal is on the agenda for today's meeting of the CIRM governing board, which is expected to act
tonight on all the appeals filed in the $243 million disease team
round. The $35 million basic biology round is expected to be acted on
tomorrow.
Good News on Three Appeals; Not-so-Good News for StemCells Inc. and Klein
A Los Angeles biotech firm, Capricor,
Inc., and a UC Irvine researcher, Henry Klassen, appear to be assured tonight of winning their appeals for nearly $20 million each from the
California stem cell agency.
A research team at UCLA – Stanley F.
Nelson and M. Carrie Miceli – also apparently won its appeal on its application but
only on a substantially revised basis, according to a CIRM document.
The agency indicated it would fund the grant but at reduced scope and
cost – $6 million instead of $20 million.
However, StemCells, Inc., which was
publicly supported by the former chairman of the stem cell agency,
Robert Klein, lost its appeal for $20 million. The CIRM document said
research cited by Klein as contradicting what reviewers identified as a key weakness did not contain “compelling data.”
A fifth applicant who appealed, Tim
Hoey of OncoMed Pharmaceutical of Redwod City, Ca., was also rejected during the re-review
process on a $20 million application.
The CIRM governing board, in July, sent
all five applications back for reconsideration as a result of appeals of negative decisions by reviewers. The move followed a record-breaking level of appeals by researchers during an emotional meeting filled with
testimony from patient advocates. The appeals came in a round that was budgeted originally for $243 million
and that represents one of the agency's key efforts to commercialize stem
cell research.
It was also the first time the agency's
governing board has engaged in such an extensive re-review process on
applications.
The revised recommendations for funding
are scheduled to be acted on tonight at a meeting of the CIRM board in Burlingame, Ca. The panel has
almost never rejected positive decisions by its review group and is
likely to accept the latest recommendations. The board is deeply
concerned about maintaining the integrity of the review process and
not rejecting reviewer decisions without ample consideration.
The recommendations for funding on
Capricor's application by Linda Marban, CEO of the firm, and the one from UC Irvine by Henry Klassen both contain conditions, but those
probably will not stand in the way of acceptance by the applicants. (The executive chairman of Capricor is
Frank Litvack, who last year was a candidate for chairman of the
California stem cell agency.)
StemCells, Inc., of Newark, Ca., which
is a publicly traded firm, had two applications in the disease team
round. One dealing with spinal injuries was approved. However, the
agency in its re-review of the second, dealing with Alzheimer's,
said,
“The reviewers did not feel there was compelling data for neuron migration in the submitted manuscript. This is the manuscript specifically referenced at the ICOC (CIRM governing board) meeting (in July) that prompted the call for additional analysis. The manuscript is not yet accepted, it is 'potentially acceptable' but requires 'major revisions' according to the journal editor note. In addition, however, the studies in this manuscript used mouse NSCs, not the human NSCs proposed for the disease team award....”
In his pitch to the CIRM board, Klein
said, “....(W)e have brand-new data that demonstrates and totally
contradicts the key weakness on which it was downgraded.”
In the document prepared for the CIRM
board, Ellen Feigal, senior vice president for research and
development, discussed the re-review process and gave more details on
the decisions. She said,
“In consultation with the Chair of the ICOC and CIRM scientific staff, the President and the Co-Vice Chair determined that the additional analysis should be conducted by the Review Chair of the GWG(grant review group), another scientific member of the review panel, and a patient advocate member of the GWG. The additional scientist reviewer was selected based on the expertise necessary to assess the new information. Each of the 3 individuals (chair, scientist, and patient advocate) voted on whether the information changed the funding recommendation by the GWG. A new score was not assigned."
Feigal continued,
“For each application, the information provided or referenced at the board meeting, and associated specific additional material were requested from the applicant. The new information was evaluated in all cases by the GWG Review Chair as well as one of the originally assigned reviewers and a patient advocate.”
Feigal's report does not identify the
applicants by name – only by application number. Here is the number
and name for those who do not want to wade through the CIRM web site
to determine who is who: 5735 Capricor, 5739 Klassen, 5426 UCLA,
5352 Oncomed, 5416 StemCells, Inc.
The California Stem Cell Report will provide gavel-to-gavel coverage of tonight's and tomorrow's meeting of the CIRM board. The session will be audiocast live on the Internet. Interested parties can participate in the meeting at teleconference locations in Pleasanton, Los Angeles and La Jolla. The agency has added another way of listening to the proceedings -- a dial-in method using an 800 number. Details are on the agenda.
Labels:
appeals,
conflicts,
disease team,
klein,
lobbying
Tuesday, September 04, 2012
Seven Researchers Appeal in $35 Million California Stem Cell Round
Three more researchers are attempting
to overturn rejection of their applications for millions from the $3
billion California stem cell agency, including one who reported detecting an "evil" stem cell earlier this year.
They are competing in the $35 million
basic biology grant round to be acted on tomorrow and Thursday by the
governing board of the agency. They join four other scientists who
are also asking the board to overturn reviewer rejection of their
applications.
The latest three appellants are Song Li of UC Berkeley, who
is seeking $1.3 million: Yanhong Shi of the City of Hope, who is
asking for $1.4 million, and Wange Lu of USC, who is seeking $1.3 million..
Of the total of seven researchers
appealing decisions, five received higher scientific scores on their
applications than the lowest approved by reviewers.
Of the latest three appellants, Shi
received a scientific score of 70, ranking above three grants
approved by reviewers. Li's application received a scientific score of 67, ranking above two grants approved by reviewers. Li received international attention last June with published research that identified an “evil” stem cell
involving heart disease. CIRM did not
release a score for Lu's application but its review summary was
listed below that of the lowest scoring application that was
approved.
The lower scoring but successful
applications were all given the go-ahead on the basis of
“programmatic” reasons, which one
CIRM document says is designed to allow “consideration of
issues beyond scientific merit, such as disease representation and
societal impact.”
Shi defended her application on what
CIRM might call programmatic grounds. She also pointed to new
developments in her research. Li pointed to his “ground-breaking” findings in June to support his application, research,
in this case, that was published. (Li's research on "evil" stem cells was reported early in June, more than two weeks prior to the review of his application. It is unclear whether the research was part of the discussion about his application.) Lu said that reviewer comments on her
application were “biased away from the current state of the art.”
The seven appeals follow a record outpouring in July. During this week's week meeting, the CIRM
governing board is expected to move to curb researcher appeals. More
are likely be heard in the future as the reviewers diverge from
scientific scores as they make their decisions.
(Editor's note: The information on the timing of Li's research on "evil" stem cells and review of his application was not included last night in the original version of this item.)
(Editor's note: The information on the timing of Li's research on "evil" stem cells and review of his application was not included last night in the original version of this item.)
Monday, September 03, 2012
Serrano Sewell Confirms Departure from Stem Cell Agency
David Serrano Sewell has confirmed that
he has resigned as a director of the $3 billion California stem cell
agency.
In an email to the California Stem Cell
Report, he said he is “excited and honored about the new
assignment” on the California state board that regulates
physicians. Gov. Jerry Brown appointed Sewell, who is a deputy city attorney for the city of San Francisco, to the board last week.
We reported Sewell's departure from the stem cell agency on
Saturday. In his Aug. 30 letter of resignation, he said:
“As a founding ICOC (CIRM governing board) member, it was a privilege to work with Robert Klein, his drive to fulfill our mission – fudning the best science to discover cures – is inspiring. Collectively, our innovative approach has made California the world leader in stem cell research.”
A Business Perspective on Stem Cell Grant Appeals
A stem cell company business executive sent the following comment via email concerning the item on the four appeals that have been filed on grant applications to be considered by the board of the California stem cell agency Wednesday and Thursday:
“I find it very interesting that the academics have found a way to appeal decisions that they do not agree with. Outstanding for-profit company grant applications have been denied any right of appeal for years. In my discussions with some of the school who are appealing, their common complaint is that the reviewers did not read their applications, must have been someone else’s! WOW! Ninety-seven percent of funds to date have gone to the academics. Of the 3 percent, most of it went to three handpicked companies. Looks like the status quo is not changing. I predict that a year from now the percentages will be about the same.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)